Professor Steven Jones presented brand new and compelling evidence for the controlled demolition of the twin towers and WTC 7 recently, but the 9/11 debunkers and the corporate media are loathe to tackle it because it represents a slam dunk on proving the collapse of the buildings was a deliberate act of arson.
During a talk at the Rebuilding America’s Senses event at the University of Texas last month, Jones laid out facts about steel samples recovered from the WTC site that Popular Mechanics dare not even attempt to debate. Debunkers are scared to even get near this information because the science behind it fundamentally contradicts the official story of what happened on 9/11.
Jones detailed his lab experiments in which he attempted to replicate NIST’s conclusion that the lava like orange material flowing out of the south tower is aluminum from Flight 175, the plane that hit the building. Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum. Jones then explains that the material is in fact a compound that can cut through steel like a hot knife through butter, thermite with sulphur added to make thermite.
The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on.
The spheres contained iron and aluminum, which would be expected in any steel sample, but also sulphur which is a by-product of a thermite reaction.
So having moved from a hypothesis that thermite was used to bring down the towers from using video footage and debunking the aluminum explanation of NIST, Jones now has empirical scientific proof, undertaken under laboratory conditions, that thermite was indeed used as an artificial explosive at the World Trade Center.
It has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 was an act of deliberate arson and not as a result of fires from crashing planes.
Jones’ evidence offers no other conclusion that insiders planted thermite devices within the buildings to literally pulverize the supporting columns and cause the collapse of the towers and also WTC 7. Debunkers have uniformly failed to address the existence of thermite and also molten metal at the ground zero site because they cannot dismiss the scientific proof, and are forced to resort to ad hominem insults and smears.
We are issuing a challenge to Popular Mechanics to rebut Professor Jones’ analysis of the sphere samples and the clear evidence of thermite at the World Trade Center. Address the focused scientific proof without resorting to ad hominem attacks or straying off topic.
We don’t expect the progenitors of yellow journalism to have any answers for what constitutes the smoking gun of controlled demolition.
"The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on."
Really? And how did the good Prof prove where he got the samples from? Able to obtain huh?????? 🙄
I wouldn't get overly excited at the good professor's "scientific proof". As i recall college chemistry the compound he is talking about is a common mixture of aluminum oxide (which is always present as a microscopic layer on most aluminum that isn't polished daily) and iron oxide (which always occurs on unproteted iron and is commonly known as "rust". When these two states of decomposing aluminum and iron (steel, if you prefer) are introduced to higher heat (somewhere above where i melt lead all the time) they absorb all the available heat and turn into a genuine conflagration all their own. And they end up leaving kind of a colorful mess, as i recall.
So, back to the Twin Towers, there was definitely aluminum at the Towers, all over the place not only in the construction but also as furniture and trimmings. The place was full of aluminum. Tons of aluminum. Rule-1: All aluminum has aluminum oxide on the outside of it. Rule-2: All steel has some amount of oxide ("rust") on the exterior. Especially any steel that is exposed to the elements or where daily moisture in the form of humidity exists. So, you take a building full of aluminum oxide and rust, and heat it up to somewhere over the melting point of lead, which obviously happened, and …bingo… you have something with kind of a life of it's own that might be called thermite. Or more simply the products of combustion involving various metals.
But don't tell the professor; he's on a roll. And don't tell the people who listen to him; they would not understand how massive columns of reinforcing rod ("ReBar") had a significant continuous layer of rust on them from being oxidized during construction by the wet concrete covering that was poured over them, and which crumbled away during collapse, exposing the massive columns of rust to the tons of melting aluminum coming from above bathed in thousands of gallons of explosive, burning aviation fuel……..
If you have a heat source that can attain ignition point for Aluminum Oxide and Iron Oxide, you can make your own "globules". And if you can't do it yourself, you can hire most good welders in a modern shop to make you some.
The fact is, there are a lot of amazing scientific theories floating around today. Some have about the same amount of validity present as was available in the old alchemists' dreams of turning lead into gold.
The highly qualified professor claims there is evidence of sulfur, which therefore indicates thermite was used. If he's a professor and I failed to graduate high school, how come I can plainly see that sulfur can be present for many many reasons other than a thermite incident????? Because he isn't interested in the truth, he's trying to advance an agenda. I say the same thing to him I said at one time to Johnny Cochran….You can tell me all day long about the glove, but I know who who killed Nicole and Ronald Goldman……idiot
I'm not even going to address this crackpot…. what I REALLY want to know is who let him into my state?!