WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2007 – Coalition forces are finding more evidence that Iran is directly supporting insurgents in Iraq, a U.S. military officer said today.
“We know that they do have official involvement,”? Air Force Col. Donald Bacon explained during a conference call from Baghdad. “When you actually have captured Quds Force operatives and leaders in country and you know that they’re involved in it, “¦ there is no doubt that there’s official involvement.”?
Bacon is chief of strategy and plans for Multinational Force Iraq. He spoke with online journalists and “bloggers”? shortly after the command announced the detention of Mahmud Farhadi, an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force officer accused of providing weapons to Iraqi criminal elements.
“We would like to see Iran live up to their commitments that they have stated publicly “¦ to help seek a secure and stable Iraq,”? Bacon said. “When we find a Quds force operative that is instrumental to the shipment of these weapons and funding and training of these extremists, we have no choice but to fulfill our responsibilities.”?
Farhadi heads the so-called “Zafr Command,”? which trains and smuggles Iranian insurgents and weapons across the border into north-central Iraq, Bacon explained.
“The area they oversee here in Iraq is an area that we have found a lot of explosively formed penetrators. Those come from Iran,”? Bacon said. “We’ve also had a lot of indirect-fire attacks involving weapons that come from Iran, missiles, in particular, and 240 mm rockets.”?
Bacon also announced that a cache of 120 mm mortar rounds was discovered Sept. 30 in Baghdad.
“We know from our experts that they were of Iranian origin,”? Bacon said. “You wouldn’t think so because it has English markings on there, but that’s the way they market them. And you can actually look at the Iranian Web site and actually look at the weapons that they market on their Web site, and they have the same kind of markings.”?
These and other recently discovered stashed weapons belong to “rogue elements”? associated with Shiia extremists, the colonel explained. “We’re finding these things all the time,”? he said.
Bacon noted some success stories in deterring foreigners from assisting insurgents, including a particularly effective campaign involving a would-be Saudi suicide bomber who was badly burned in his unsuccessful attempt in Iraq.
“So he got captured. We gave him medical care,”? Bacon explained. “Over time he’s been sent back to Saudi Arabia where he is now fairly visible on TV talking about: “˜Hey, this is wrong. I made a mistake.’”?
You forgot to cite the source.
Sources can be easily Googled, all one has to do is copy and paste the first sentence of any article. We do not report to anyone here, this site is free, we make do not make any money from this site. We all have regular jobs and do not have the time, nor inclination to get into source citing nor do we have the desire to get into debates about it with members. We do not claim to be non biased either. This site's primary purpose is to be a repository of events, throughout the world, for our own records, as we see it.
It is agreed that one can research, as well as no one has to cite a source, but as an American and one who recognizes added value, it is great when a link to the source is provided. There is no need to personalize it, and this user apologies to neverquit for using the term "you" it was not intended as a personal attack, but merely as a strong suggestion to include it in the future.
As one will notice, the source link has been posted to the next news item without complaint and as a courtesy to those who appreciate the post and would like to know where it came from. There is no need for this user to go on about the importance of citing sources for corroborating evidence in the intelligence field, as it is obvious that this is a joint responsibility we can all take part in in this American Intelligence forum.
Please do not confuse this user for someone who has not read the FAQ, and please take the comment as consent to the posting rather than dissent. Call it support if one will. There are liberal websites for that stuff that people can go to if they want to play potty mouth and flaming spam. This user likes to think that this website is as civil and conservative as appears to be, and thus he uses it.
Thanks for a great website and keep it up!
Understood, we really appreciate the compliments. Links don't always work after awhile, so I don't really mess with them. Plus, it's more of a time issue for me personally. This is a humble, private site that is no frills, that we run for the only benefit of ourselves personally – at our own cost, and primarily for historical purposes. I am sorry if I came down hard, we've had to deal with a lot of trollers who just want to be pests. No time for it ya know? 🙂
Thank you again for the kind words.