A recent threat, purportedly from the hacker group Anonymous, stated boldly that its members would stop the internet on 31 March.
The term "Operation Blackout" was coined and it caused much discussion in all the usual forums.
Those issuing the threat even stated how they would do it. They claimed they could disable the Domain Name Service (known by engineers as the DNS) and that would stop the internet. How so?
The Domain Name Service is what converts the web addresses you type into your browser (such as www.bbc.co.uk) into what the internet actually uses: IP addresses (something like 188.8.131.52).
It is essentially the phone book for the internet. If you could prevent access to the phone book then you would effectively render the web useless.
The theory behind the proposed attack is based on the fact that the Domain Name Service is a tree structure: it starts with 13 servers at the top level and each of those talks to the next level down, which then pass it on to a further level down, and so on.
When a change is made at the top level it is copied out across the net so that when you look up what is effectively your local copy of the phone book, it takes you to the correct place.
If somehow one could prevent some or all of the 13 top level members of the DNS from working, specifically from communicating with others, then this would disrupt the remainder of the tree, and very quickly no-one would be able to use the addresses that we all typically know.
When the threat was made, it did cause some concern as the would-be hackers correctly identified the locations of the top level systems.
But, that information was relatively easy to come by from the internet itself.
The suggestion was made that the hackers could mount what is known as a distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack on the top level of the DNS.
A DDOS attack is one where you simply flood a webserver with so many requests that it can no longer respond to legitimate requests.
Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at the computer security firm Sophos, likens it to "15 fat men trying to fit through a revolving door all at once – nothing moves".
One way the hackers might generate enough traffic is by hijacking others' computers to send the requests.
They could use a virus to turn the machines into "bots" to do their bidding. The innocent owners need never be aware.
This technique was used to prevent access to Interpol's website on 28 February 2012. Hackers identifying themselves with the Anonymous movement committed the act – apparently as retaliation against recent arrests.
It is just one of many organisations to have fallen victim to the manoeuvre over the years.
"If the attacker has enough bandwidth, almost anything can be taken down," Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at the anti-malware firm F-Secure told me.
"In 2004, the massive botnet created by the Mydoom worm briefly shut down Google.com."
So the big question is whether it is possible to use a similar process to generate enough traffic to stop the whole internet.
As ever, the answer is "that depends". Not surprisingly the authorities know which are the particularly critical elements of the DNS and they have plans to protect them.
The 13 top-level systems are actually in different countries, are looked after by different organisations and run on different technologies.
We can be as sure as one can ever be when dealing with the internet, that the top level of DNS can be kept secure.
But there is a potential problem if hackers subvert the way the DNS has been set up to make it part of the attack.
This could be done by a process dubbed "amplification" which exploits two facts:
A DNS query returns far more information than was in the request itself.
It is relatively easy to falsify the address from which a query was sent.
To carry out the assault the hacker would first identify a target system and then create an army of bots spoofing its IP address.
This botnet would then send a large number of requests to the DNS which would reply, resulting in a much larger amount of data being fired at the target, causing it to be swamped.
Create several such botnets and select several targets and you can cause the DNS to flood the very network it is supposed to be serving.
BH Consulting's information security expert Brian Honan agrees there is a real-world risk.
"It should be noted though that this disruption, if successful, would be localised to segments of the internet vulnerable to these attacks," he told me.
"Unfortunately despite this vulnerability being widely known about for many years a large proportion of DNS servers are still not configured correctly to prevent this type of attack."
Recently one network provider suffered what appeared to be just such an attack that employed 140,000 machines from the Domain Name Service.
The attack was able to generate such an avalanche of data that it completely overwhelmed the network.
There are relatively simple ways of reconfiguring the machines within the Domain Name Service so that they conduct their searches in an alternative way that doesn't allow this "amplification". But few machines do this.
Another technology know as domain name system security extensions (DNSSEC) has also been designed to mitigate such an assault by preventing contributory weaknesses such as IP spoofing. But only a fortnight ago a study suggested that 40% of the US government's part of the DNS had not implemented it, despite it being US government policy to do so.
And, consider for a moment what would happen if the DNS network was used to attack itself using such an amplification technique? The resulting torrent of data could render significant portions of the web unusable, preventing all of us from accessing the systems we have come to rely upon in our daily lives.
So to those who say our Domain Name Service is secure and can never be used to disable to internet, I say, never say never.
Alan Woodward is a visiting professor at the University of Surrey's department of computing. He has worked for the UK government and still provides advice on issues including cybersecurity, covert communications and forensic computing.